| 46 | 0 | 232 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为缩小老年群体与年轻群体间的“数字鸿沟”,释放老年消费市场潜力,文章基于2020年中国老年社会追踪调查的1333个老年样本,系统探究代际数字反哺对老年群体消费升级的影响及作用机制。基准回归结果显示,代际数字反哺对老年群体消费升级具有显著正向影响,且该结论经剔除过老样本、分位数回归及工具变量法(以老年人可上网电子设备熟练度为工具变量)检验后依然稳健。异质性分析表明,该促进作用在与年轻世代同住、居住于城市、受过初等教育的老年群体中更为显著;而未受过教育的老年人因难以吸收反哺技能,受过高等教育的老年人因反哺内容与自身习惯冲突,反哺效果不显著或呈负向。机制检验发现,地区移动电话覆盖率对“代际数字反哺—老年群体消费升级”关系起负向调节作用,而居民消费价格指数对“代际数字反哺—老年群体消费升级”关系起正向调节作用。
Abstract:Aiming at narrowing the“digital divide”between the elderly and the younger generations and unleash the potential of the elderly consumer market,this study systematically explores the impact and underlying mechanisms of intergenerational digital feedback on the consumption upgrading of the elderly. Based on a sample of 1,333 elderly individuals from the 2020 China Longitudinal Aging Social Survey,the baseline regression results indicate that intergenerational digital feedback has a significant positive impact on consumption upgrading among the elderly. This conclusion remains robust after conducting tests excluding older samples,quantile regression,and instrumental variable analysis,using the elderly's proficiency in using internet-ready electronic devices as an instrumental variable. Heterogeneity analysis reveals that this promotional effect is more pronounced among elderly individuals who live with younger generations,reside in urban areas,or have received primary education. However,the feedback effect is insignificant or negative for the uneducated,who encounter formidable barriers in internalizing the feedback,and for the highly educated,for whom the feedback conflicts with their established habits. Mechanism tests indicate that regional mobile phone coverage negatively moderates the relationship between “intergenerational digital feedback and elderly consumption upgrading,”whereas the Consumer Price Index(CPI) positively moderates this relationship.
[1]孙兆.解码银发经济发展趋势[N].中国经济时报,2024-06-04(3).
[2]周裕琼,丁海琼.中国家庭三代数字反哺现状及影响因素研究[J].国际新闻界,2020,42(3):6-31.
[3]陈友华.人口红利与人口负债:数量界定、经验观察与理论思考[J].人口研究,2005(6):23-29.
[4]陆杰华,韦晓丹.老年数字鸿沟治理的分析框架、理念及其路径选择———基于数字鸿沟与知沟理论视角[J].人口研究,2021,45(3):17-30.
[5]Hargittai E. The Digital Divide and What To Do About It[J]. In D. C. Jones,2003,31(6):995-1006.
[6]Dimaggio P,Harittai E,Celeste C,et al. Excerpts from“Digital Inequality:From Unequal Access to Differentiated Use”[J]. Inequality in the United States:A Reader,2020:98-113.
[7]赵庆婷,高昊.农村地区老年人短视频使用的数字反哺现象研究———基于山西省中上达村的考察[J].传媒观察,2021(9):75-82.
[8]Allan M,Jan G. Dig Eu Lit:Concepts and Tools for Digital Literacy Development[J]. Italics,2006,5(4).
[9]苏岚岚,张航宇,彭艳玲.农民数字素养驱动数字乡村发展的机理研究[J].电子政务,2021(10):42-56.
[10]武小龙,王涵.农民数字素养:框架体系、驱动效应及培育路径———一个胜任素质理论的分析视角[J].电子政务,2023(8):105-119.
[11]刘昌黎,徐金陆,刘嘉航,等.数字化转型促进体育消费升级的推进策略研究[J].天津体育学院学报,2025,40(2):188-194+219.
[12]吴遵民,朱新洲,杨慧康,等.银发经济与老年教育:关系辨析、互动机制与路径优化[J].开放教育研究,2025,31(2):78-87.
[13]柳江,张颖,施惠玲.人口老龄化、移动互联网与居民消费水平[J].西北人口,2025,46(1):117-126.
[14]盛亦男,尚佳佳.社交活动对新一代老年人消费的影响[J].人口研究,2024,48(4):84-98.
[15]刘鹏程.消费升级不能忽略老年人[J].中国社会工作,2023(23):1.
[16]杨菊华.农村老龄人口的数字鸿沟与智慧康养的现状、问题与应对思路[J].社会科学辑刊,2023(4):72-81+238.
[17]J S C,Neil C,D A F,et al. Factors predicting the use of technology:findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement(CREATE)[J]. Psychology and aging,2006,21(2):333-52.
[18]Hargittai Eszter,Hsieh Yuli Patrick. Digital Inequality[G/OL]//Dutton W H(ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Online ed. Oxford Academic,2013-03-12.
[19]Silverstein,Merril,Bengtson,et al. Intergenerational Solidarity and the Structure of Adult Child-Parent Relationships in American Families.[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1997.
[20]Tarafdar M,Pullins E B,Ragu-Nathan T S. Technostress:negative effect on performance and possible mitigations[J]. Information Systems Journal,2015.
[21]Vassilakopoulou P,Hustad E. Bridging Digital Divides:a Literature Review and Research Agenda for Information Systems Research[J]. Information Systems Frontiers,2021(2):955-969.
[22]Jiaping Z,Huirong Z,Xiaomei G. Mobile payment and rural household consumption:Evidence from China[J]. Telecommunications Policy,2022,46(3).
[23]张翼.当前中国社会各阶层的消费倾向———从生存性消费到发展性消费[J].社会学研究,2016,31(4):74-97+243-244.
[24]尹志超,吴子硕,严雨.数字经济能激发农村家庭消费活力吗?[J].经济管理,2023,45(12):5-25.
[25]席晓青,谢荷锋,陈南岳. CCI与CPI关系的实证研究[J].管理评论,2009,21(5):93-96+114.
[26]李强,孟如.数字反哺驱动农村老年人智慧居家养老参与的内在机理与微观证据[J].电子政务,2024(3):105-116.
[27]焦开山,马子恒.亲子关系与技术反哺行为研究———基于宁夏某社区的调查[J].宁夏党校学报,2021,23(6):81-92.
[28]朱秀凌.青少年的手机使用、数字代沟与文化反哺———基于对福建省漳州市中学生家庭的实证分析[J].新闻界,2015(11):47-53.
[29]李彪.数字反哺与群体压力:老年群体微信朋友圈使用行为影响因素研究[J].国际新闻界,2020,42(3):32-48.
[30]张可,杨欢.以数字媒介教育弥合农村老人数字鸿沟[J].青年记者,2022(22):25-27.
(1)数据来源:国家统计局:《中国统计年鉴2025》,北京:中国统计出版社,2025年9月版。https://www. stats. gov. cn/sj/ndsj/2025/indexch. htm
(2)数据来源:中国互联网络信息中心(CNNIC):《第56次中国互联网络发展状况统计报告》,2025年7月21日发布,北京:中国互联网络信息中心。https://source. ckcloud. busionline. com/2025-08-06_68930f425efa0. pdf
基本信息:
DOI:10.13773/j.cnki.51-1637/z.2026.04.003
中图分类号:F49;F126.1;D669.6
引用信息:
[1]冀嘉豪,吴华安.代际数字反哺对老年群体消费升级的影响[J].攀枝花学院学报,2026,43(04):23-35.DOI:10.13773/j.cnki.51-1637/z.2026.04.003.
2025-10-07
2025
2025-11-03
2025-12-24
2025
1
2026-07-15
2026-07-15